QSV Equity Investors
Q3 2023 Commentary
Q3 2023 was difficult for U.S. equities as the reality that “higher for longer” truly will mean higher interest rates for longer gelled in the minds of investors. The Federal Reserve is intent on fighting inflation and seems committed to keeping rates high and conditions tight for the foreseeable future, causing concerns over the impact on the economy. Economic growth and interest rates impact smaller companies more than large, and small caps experienced a double digit drop from their July peak through the quarter-end. Three months is a brief period for investors focused on the long term, yet Q3 2023 was a quarter, given the market environment, where we expected our stock selection in the QSV strategies to perform better.
Particularly within the QSV Small Cap and Select strategies, a handful of companies disappointed. Some of these, we believe, still deserve a place in the portfolios and we have added to certain names at lower prices where the disappointment is believed to be temporary. Others we have exited in favor of higher conviction positions.
Beyond security selection, the headwinds to our portfolios from being underweight in energy were considerable this quarter. The Energy sector was up over 18% within the Russell 2000 Value index, while every other sector – save Financials at +1.04% – were in negative territory. QSV has historically been underweight in energy companies. In a period of $90 per barrel oil, many energy companies can boast high returns on invested capital; at more “normal” prices it is challenging to find energy businesses with competitive advantages, disciplined management, and the high business returns that we require.
QSV’s Small Cap and Select strategies underperformed their respective Russell value indexes during the quarter while QSV Mid Cap was in line with its index. More information including since-inception performance for each of the strategies may be found at www.qsvequity.com.
QSV Strategy Quarterly Performance
QSV Small Cap returned -5.24% and -5.31%, gross and net of fees, lagging the Russell 2000 Value Index return of -2.96% and the Russell 2000 Index return of -5.13%. The most significant positive impact was made in Consumer Discretionary companies, where QSV added value in security selection and was underweight compared to the index, and in Healthcare, where QSV was overweight and added value through security selection. An underweight and company selection in Energy companies accounted for nearly all the Small Cap portfolio’s underperformance relative to the index. Company selection in Real Estate also detracted from relative returns.
QSV Small Cap Top Contributors
Capri Holdings, Ltd. (CPRI) was the leading contributor to performance during the quarter as shares rose 46%. The purveyor of Michael Kors, Jimmy Choo and Versace agreed to be acquired by Tapestry (TPR) for $57 per share. We expect the deal with TPR to close in 2024 and exited our position placing the proceeds in companies we believe provide better opportunities.
For the second consecutive quarter, foodservice packaging company Karat Packaging (KRT) was a leading contributor to performance. Gross margins improved as KRT continued to benefit from lower input and shipping costs. Core products continue to show sales growth and the company’s Eco-friendly product sales are trending above 30%. The company initiated a quarterly dividend during the quarter, underscoring the strength of its free cash flow. KRT generates returns on invested capital of 15%.
QSV Small Cap Top Detractors
After being one of the portfolio’s greatest contributors for the year, shares of Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) dropped on the news that it would restate the prior three quarters’ results due to understating cost of goods sold. NSSC is a global provider and manufacturer of high-tech security, and internet-connected home, video, fire alarm, access control, and door locking systems, serving commercial, industrial, residential, and government markets. Management has said the issue is resolved and will not impact results going forward. We have concerns about management’s controls that led to the need for the restatement and will continue to closely monitor the business. Prior to this restatement, we had sold
a meaningful amount of the position on strength.
Forward Air (FWRD) shares were hit on news that they are merging with private company Omni Logistics, a provider of global freight forwarding and third-party logistics services. The merger will roughly double the scale of FWRD and will add new growth opportunities with an asset light business, yet it does present integration risks. QSV acknowledges these risks but sees opportunities for growth and cost synergies within the business. We added to our position in FWRD on weakness in its shares.
QSV Small Cap Portfolio Activity
The acquisitions of Capri Holdings (CPRI) by Tapestry and PDC Energy (PDCE) by Chevron prompted the exit of those positions during the quarter. Johnson Outdoors (JOUT), UMH Properties (UMH), and UniFirst Corporation (UNF) were sold due to business performance that did not meet our expectations and the opportunity to upgrade to better ideas. New positions were initiated in professional medical platform Doximity (DOCS), business process management company ExlService (EXLS), LabCorp spin-out Fortrea Holdings (FTRE), Hanover Insurance (THG), real estate finance company Walker & Dunlop (WD), and digital media company Ziff Davis (ZD).
QSV Mid Cap returned -4.32%, gross of fees for the quarter, leading the Russell Mid Cap Value Index return of -4.46% and the Russell Mid Cap Index return of -4.68%. The net return of -4.55% lagged the Russell Mid Cap Value Index while exceeding the Russell Mid Cap Index. Security selection in Consumer Discretionary and Industrials companies helped relative performance, while selection in Financials and Real Estate businesses detracted.
QSV Mid Cap Top Contributors
Outsourced payroll and human capital management provider Trinet Group, Inc. (TNET) was the leading contributor to performance in the quarter. Increasing use of technology, digitization of the HR function, employment growth in new industries and increasing geographic decentralization of the small and medium-sized business workforce all create favorable trends for TNET. TNET has competitive advantages relative to its peers that include its scale and the efficiencies offered through the consolidation of its operating units on a single technology platform. TNET generates returns on invested capital of 28% and shares are at a discount to our estimate of intrinsic value.
Shares of APA Corporation (APA) gained more than 20% during the quarter on rising oil prices, contributing to the results of QSV Mid Cap. APA produces oil and gas with operations in the U.S., Egypt and the United Kingdom, and exploration activities offshore in Suriname. APA generates strong free cash flows and is committed to returning 60% to its shareholders, primarily through share repurchases, dividends and paying down its debt.
QSV Mid Cap Top Detractors
Masimo Corporation (MASI) fell on poor financial results and lowered future guidance. Results were impacted by issues that included lower hospital volumes, elevated channel inventory levels, and hospital labor inflation that is impacting capital equipment demand. MASI is a medical technology company which develops, manufactures, and markets non-invasive vital sign monitoring devices and offers consumer audio products. The integration of its acquisition of Sound Audio has continued to present challenges to the business and we exited the position in favor of higher conviction businesses.
Etsy Inc. (ETSY) detracted from performance during the quarter. Etsy markets differentiated products through its “House of Brands” which includes Esty.com, Reverb, and Depop. Competitive advantages include the diversity of its offerings, a strong base of active buyers and sellers, and productivity tools it offers sellers. Despite these advantages, with rising fuel prices, the resumption of student loan payments, and a shift by consumers to “experiences” over goods, we believe there are better opportunities for our investors, thus we exited the position during the quarter.
QSV Mid Cap Portfolio Activity
Turnover during the quarter was higher than usual as QSV took opportunities to upgrade its portfolio. As noted above, Etsy (ETSY) and Masimo (MASI) were exited for business performance reasons. A.O. Smith (AOS), Cintas (CTAS), and Ross Stores (ROST) were sold for valuation reasons and Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA) was sold to allocate to better ideas. New positions were initiated in digital services provider Amdocs (DOX), nitrogen producer CF Industries (CF), LabCorp spin-out Fortrea Holdings (FTRE), GPS-enabled hardware and software provider Garmin (GRMN), Match Group (MTCH), elevator and escalator manufacturer OTIS Worldwide (OTIS), and Waters (WAT), a provider of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry products.
QSV Select returned -6.25% and -6.45%, gross and net of fees, lagging the returns of -3.66% and -4.78%, respectively for the Russell 2500 Value and the Russell 2500 Indexes. Select is a high conviction strategy that takes QSV’s best ideas from our Small Cap and Mid Cap strategies. An underweight and company selection in Consumer Discretionary companies helped performance as did QSV’s absence in the poorly performing Utilities sector. Company selection detracted from performance in the Financials sector as did our underweight and underperformance in Energy businesses.
QSV Select Top Contributors
Brady Corporation (BRC) was the leading contributor to performance during the quarter as the company beat consensus earnings estimates and raised its guidance for the full year. The company manufactures and sells identification and workplace safety products through its Identification Solutions and Workplace Safety segments. BRC has niche advantages in safety, identification, and compliance markets and has a diversified customer base, products, and geographic footprint. The company’s strong free cash flows have supported dividend increases for thirty-seven consecutive years, share buybacks and strategic acquisitions.
EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) rose as quarterly results were better than anticipated. The company has diversified its workforce away from its previous exposure to Ukraine and the belief that demand for the company’s services may be bottoming raised investor sentiment. The global technology services company has a network of multidisciplinary teams delivering software product development and digital platform engineering services. Most of the firm’s revenues are generated from U.S. customers and its top twenty clients (representing 41% of revenue) have been with EPAM for an average of ten years. Returns on invested capital stand at 17%.
QSV Select Top Detractors
Masimo Corporation (MASI) and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) were the leading detractors from performance in Q3 and are discussed above.
QSV Select Portfolio Activity
QSV took opportunities to upgrade the Select portfolio during the quarter. Shares of PDC Energy (PDCE) were sold as Chevron (CVX) acquired the business. Generac Holdings (GNRC) was sold for valuation reasons. Positions were initiated in CF Industries (CF) and Fortrea Holdings (FTRE).
Our Focus on the Long Term
Investors began the last quarter on an optimistic note, while bullishness faded in September. Strength of the consumer continues to be touted as a positive for the economy (Americans Are Still Spending Like There’s No Tomorrow), as are strong employment and rising labor participation rates. Yet credit card debt is high and student loan payments are again due. Persistent inflation and higher interest rates will also weigh on the consumer as well as on corporate earnings. The Financial Times notes that 30% of the debt of Russell 2000 companies is variable rate debt (as compared to 6% for S&P 500 companies), presenting risks to lower quality, more leveraged businesses.
At this stage in the market cycle, we believe that QSV’s style of investing and our investors should do well. Late cycle investing favorsthe lower volatility stocks of quality businesses, those that have limited debt, high interest rate coverage and strong free cash flows. Selectivity is important and opportunities abound in small to mid-cap stocks that have been overlooked in the narrow market that dominated the first half of the year. Investors will also do well to check their asset allocation; the mega-cap led markets of 2023 have left many portfolios in an unbalanced state and shifts in allocations may be due.
Disclaimer:
Returns are for the respective composites of QSV Equity Investors. Gross returns are calculated net of trading fees. Net returns are calculated net of trading fees and net of the firm’s management fee. All dividends are assumed to be reinvested. The returns of the QSV Small Cap strategy are compared to the historical performance of the Russell 2000 Indices as they are a widely used benchmarks for small capitalization securities. The returns of the QSV Mid Cap strategy are compared to the historical performance of the Russell Midcap Indices as they are a widely used benchmarks for mid capitalization securities. The returns of the QSV Select strategy are compared to the historical performance of the Russell 2500 Indices as they are a widely used benchmarks for SMID capitalization securities. An investment with QSV Equity Investors should not be construed as an investment in a program that seeks to replicate, or correlate with, these indices. Market conditions vary between the QSV products and these indices. Furthermore, these indices do not include any transaction costs, management fees and other expenses, as do the QSV products. Lastly, QSV may invest in securities and positions that are not included in these indices.
No client or potential client should assume that any information presented should be construed as personalized investment advice. Personalized investment advice can only be rendered after engagement of the firm for services, execution of the required documentation, and receipt of required disclosures. Investing carries risk of loss.
QSV Equity Investors, LLC claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®). GIPS® is a registered trademark of the CFA Institute. CFA Institute does not endorse or promote this organization, nor does it warrant the accuracy or quality of the content contained herein. To view a GIPS report, please visit www.qsvequity.com.
QSV Equity Investors, LLC is a registered investment advisor. For additional information about the firm and its professionals please visit the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.
QSV Equity Investors
Q3 2023 Commentary
Q3 2023 was difficult for U.S. equities as the reality that “higher for longer” truly will mean higher interest rates for longer gelled in the minds of investors. The Federal Reserve is intent on fighting inflation and seems committed to keeping rates high and conditions tight for the foreseeable future, causing concerns over the impact on the economy. Economic growth and interest rates impact smaller companies more than large, and small caps experienced a double digit drop from their July peak through the quarter-end. Three months is a brief period for investors focused on the long term, yet Q3 2023 was a quarter, given the market environment, where we expected our stock selection in the QSV strategies to perform better.
Particularly within the QSV Small Cap and Select strategies, a handful of companies disappointed. Some of these, we believe, still deserve a place in the portfolios and we have added to certain names at lower prices where the disappointment is believed to be temporary. Others we have exited in favor of higher conviction positions.
Beyond security selection, the headwinds to our portfolios from being underweight in energy were considerable this quarter. The Energy sector was up over 18% within the Russell 2000 Value index, while every other sector – save Financials at +1.04% – were in negative territory. QSV has historically been underweight in energy companies. In a period of $90 per barrel oil, many energy companies can boast high returns on invested capital; at more “normal” prices it is challenging to find energy businesses with competitive advantages, disciplined management, and the high business returns that we require.
QSV’s Small Cap and Select strategies underperformed their respective Russell value indexes during the quarter while QSV Mid Cap was in line with its index. More information including since-inception performance for each of the strategies may be found at www.qsvequity.com.
QSV Strategy Quarterly Performance
QSV Small Cap returned -5.24% and -5.31%, gross and net of fees, lagging the Russell 2000 Value Index return of -2.96% and the Russell 2000 Index return of -5.13%. The most significant positive impact was made in Consumer Discretionary companies, where QSV added value in security selection and was underweight compared to the index, and in Healthcare, where QSV was overweight and added value through security selection. An underweight and company selection in Energy companies accounted for nearly all the Small Cap portfolio’s underperformance relative to the index. Company selection in Real Estate also detracted from relative returns.
QSV Small Cap Top Contributors
Capri Holdings, Ltd. (CPRI) was the leading contributor to performance during the quarter as shares rose 46%. The purveyor of Michael Kors, Jimmy Choo and Versace agreed to be acquired by Tapestry (TPR) for $57 per share. We expect the deal with TPR to close in 2024 and exited our position placing the proceeds in companies we believe provide better opportunities.
For the second consecutive quarter, foodservice packaging company Karat Packaging (KRT) was a leading contributor to performance. Gross margins improved as KRT continued to benefit from lower input and shipping costs. Core products continue to show sales growth and the company’s Eco-friendly product sales are trending above 30%. The company initiated a quarterly dividend during the quarter, underscoring the strength of its free cash flow. KRT generates returns on invested capital of 15%.
QSV Small Cap Top Detractors
After being one of the portfolio’s greatest contributors for the year, shares of Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) dropped on the news that it would restate the prior three quarters’ results due to understating cost of goods sold. NSSC is a global provider and manufacturer of high-tech security, and internet-connected home, video, fire alarm, access control, and door locking systems, serving commercial, industrial, residential, and government markets. Management has said the issue is resolved and will not impact results going forward. We have concerns about management’s controls that led to the need for the restatement and will continue to closely monitor the business. Prior to this restatement, we had sold
a meaningful amount of the position on strength.
Forward Air (FWRD) shares were hit on news that they are merging with private company Omni Logistics, a provider of global freight forwarding and third-party logistics services. The merger will roughly double the scale of FWRD and will add new growth opportunities with an asset light business, yet it does present integration risks. QSV acknowledges these risks but sees opportunities for growth and cost synergies within the business. We added to our position in FWRD on weakness in its shares.
QSV Small Cap Portfolio Activity
The acquisitions of Capri Holdings (CPRI) by Tapestry and PDC Energy (PDCE) by Chevron prompted the exit of those positions during the quarter. Johnson Outdoors (JOUT), UMH Properties (UMH), and UniFirst Corporation (UNF) were sold due to business performance that did not meet our expectations and the opportunity to upgrade to better ideas. New positions were initiated in professional medical platform Doximity (DOCS), business process management company ExlService (EXLS), LabCorp spin-out Fortrea Holdings (FTRE), Hanover Insurance (THG), real estate finance company Walker & Dunlop (WD), and digital media company Ziff Davis (ZD).
QSV Mid Cap returned -4.32%, gross of fees for the quarter, leading the Russell Mid Cap Value Index return of -4.46% and the Russell Mid Cap Index return of -4.68%. The net return of -4.55% lagged the Russell Mid Cap Value Index while exceeding the Russell Mid Cap Index. Security selection in Consumer Discretionary and Industrials companies helped relative performance, while selection in Financials and Real Estate businesses detracted.
QSV Mid Cap Top Contributors
Outsourced payroll and human capital management provider Trinet Group, Inc. (TNET) was the leading contributor to performance in the quarter. Increasing use of technology, digitization of the HR function, employment growth in new industries and increasing geographic decentralization of the small and medium-sized business workforce all create favorable trends for TNET. TNET has competitive advantages relative to its peers that include its scale and the efficiencies offered through the consolidation of its operating units on a single technology platform. TNET generates returns on invested capital of 28% and shares are at a discount to our estimate of intrinsic value.
Shares of APA Corporation (APA) gained more than 20% during the quarter on rising oil prices, contributing to the results of QSV Mid Cap. APA produces oil and gas with operations in the U.S., Egypt and the United Kingdom, and exploration activities offshore in Suriname. APA generates strong free cash flows and is committed to returning 60% to its shareholders, primarily through share repurchases, dividends and paying down its debt.
QSV Mid Cap Top Detractors
Masimo Corporation (MASI) fell on poor financial results and lowered future guidance. Results were impacted by issues that included lower hospital volumes, elevated channel inventory levels, and hospital labor inflation that is impacting capital equipment demand. MASI is a medical technology company which develops, manufactures, and markets non-invasive vital sign monitoring devices and offers consumer audio products. The integration of its acquisition of Sound Audio has continued to present challenges to the business and we exited the position in favor of higher conviction businesses.
Etsy Inc. (ETSY) detracted from performance during the quarter. Etsy markets differentiated products through its “House of Brands” which includes Esty.com, Reverb, and Depop. Competitive advantages include the diversity of its offerings, a strong base of active buyers and sellers, and productivity tools it offers sellers. Despite these advantages, with rising fuel prices, the resumption of student loan payments, and a shift by consumers to “experiences” over goods, we believe there are better opportunities for our investors, thus we exited the position during the quarter.
QSV Mid Cap Portfolio Activity
Turnover during the quarter was higher than usual as QSV took opportunities to upgrade its portfolio. As noted above, Etsy (ETSY) and Masimo (MASI) were exited for business performance reasons. A.O. Smith (AOS), Cintas (CTAS), and Ross Stores (ROST) were sold for valuation reasons and Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA) was sold to allocate to better ideas. New positions were initiated in digital services provider Amdocs (DOX), nitrogen producer CF Industries (CF), LabCorp spin-out Fortrea Holdings (FTRE), GPS-enabled hardware and software provider Garmin (GRMN), Match Group (MTCH), elevator and escalator manufacturer OTIS Worldwide (OTIS), and Waters (WAT), a provider of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry products.
QSV Select returned -6.25% and -6.45%, gross and net of fees, lagging the returns of -3.66% and -4.78%, respectively for the Russell 2500 Value and the Russell 2500 Indexes. Select is a high conviction strategy that takes QSV’s best ideas from our Small Cap and Mid Cap strategies. An underweight and company selection in Consumer Discretionary companies helped performance as did QSV’s absence in the poorly performing Utilities sector. Company selection detracted from performance in the Financials sector as did our underweight and underperformance in Energy businesses.
QSV Select Top Contributors
Brady Corporation (BRC) was the leading contributor to performance during the quarter as the company beat consensus earnings estimates and raised its guidance for the full year. The company manufactures and sells identification and workplace safety products through its Identification Solutions and Workplace Safety segments. BRC has niche advantages in safety, identification, and compliance markets and has a diversified customer base, products, and geographic footprint. The company’s strong free cash flows have supported dividend increases for thirty-seven consecutive years, share buybacks and strategic acquisitions.
EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) rose as quarterly results were better than anticipated. The company has diversified its workforce away from its previous exposure to Ukraine and the belief that demand for the company’s services may be bottoming raised investor sentiment. The global technology services company has a network of multidisciplinary teams delivering software product development and digital platform engineering services. Most of the firm’s revenues are generated from U.S. customers and its top twenty clients (representing 41% of revenue) have been with EPAM for an average of ten years. Returns on invested capital stand at 17%.
QSV Select Top Detractors
Masimo Corporation (MASI) and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) were the leading detractors from performance in Q3 and are discussed above.
QSV Select Portfolio Activity
QSV took opportunities to upgrade the Select portfolio during the quarter. Shares of PDC Energy (PDCE) were sold as Chevron (CVX) acquired the business. Generac Holdings (GNRC) was sold for valuation reasons. Positions were initiated in CF Industries (CF) and Fortrea Holdings (FTRE).
Our Focus on the Long Term
Investors began the last quarter on an optimistic note, while bullishness faded in September. Strength of the consumer continues to be touted as a positive for the economy (Americans Are Still Spending Like There’s No Tomorrow), as are strong employment and rising labor participation rates. Yet credit card debt is high and student loan payments are again due. Persistent inflation and higher interest rates will also weigh on the consumer as well as on corporate earnings. The Financial Times notes that 30% of the debt of Russell 2000 companies is variable rate debt (as compared to 6% for S&P 500 companies), presenting risks to lower quality, more leveraged businesses.
At this stage in the market cycle, we believe that QSV’s style of investing and our investors should do well. Late cycle investing favorsthe lower volatility stocks of quality businesses, those that have limited debt, high interest rate coverage and strong free cash flows. Selectivity is important and opportunities abound in small to mid-cap stocks that have been overlooked in the narrow market that dominated the first half of the year. Investors will also do well to check their asset allocation; the mega-cap led markets of 2023 have left many portfolios in an unbalanced state and shifts in allocations may be due.
Disclaimer:
Returns are for the respective composites of QSV Equity Investors. Gross returns are calculated net of trading fees. Net returns are calculated net of trading fees and net of the firm’s management fee. All dividends are assumed to be reinvested. The returns of the QSV Small Cap strategy are compared to the historical performance of the Russell 2000 Indices as they are a widely used benchmarks for small capitalization securities. The returns of the QSV Mid Cap strategy are compared to the historical performance of the Russell Midcap Indices as they are a widely used benchmarks for mid capitalization securities. The returns of the QSV Select strategy are compared to the historical performance of the Russell 2500 Indices as they are a widely used benchmarks for SMID capitalization securities. An investment with QSV Equity Investors should not be construed as an investment in a program that seeks to replicate, or correlate with, these indices. Market conditions vary between the QSV products and these indices. Furthermore, these indices do not include any transaction costs, management fees and other expenses, as do the QSV products. Lastly, QSV may invest in securities and positions that are not included in these indices.
No client or potential client should assume that any information presented should be construed as personalized investment advice. Personalized investment advice can only be rendered after engagement of the firm for services, execution of the required documentation, and receipt of required disclosures. Investing carries risk of loss.
QSV Equity Investors, LLC claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®). GIPS® is a registered trademark of the CFA Institute. CFA Institute does not endorse or promote this organization, nor does it warrant the accuracy or quality of the content contained herein. To view a GIPS report, please visit www.qsvequity.com.
QSV Equity Investors, LLC is a registered investment advisor. For additional information about the firm and its professionals please visit the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.